PROGRAMMATIC PRINCIPLES AND MANIFESTATION OF DIGITAL PIRATE PARTIES IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Keywords:
party, digital party, pirate party, direct democracy, manifestation, Europe
Abstract
The article systematizes the programmatic principles and basic manifestation of digital pirate parties in European countries. It is argued that pirate parties are one of the options of special or specialized parties of postmaterialist values. Since these parties focus on a rather limited range of issues, in particular on copyright and patent law, intellectual property, as well as partly on direct democracy and its modifications in the conditions of the information society. It is noted that pirate parties identify themselves as neither left nor right, but rather non-ideological ones, but they are mostly positioned as left-libertarian ones in practice. At the same time, the ideological position of such parties is unstable, because it changes depending on their electoral success or failure, as well as representation. Although these parties at least partially structure and modify the parameters of political competitiveness in general. In addition, it is found that pirate parties are extremely specific structurally, organizationally, programmatically and even discursively, and therefore they cause very ambiguous political and electoral results. The latter primarily depend on the context and current state of development of inter-party competition in one or another country. More generally, it is found that pirate parties are not very successful in the world and in certain parts of the world currently, but they may become so in the future, in particular at the background of the development of network technologies, communications and thus as a result of changes within the future framework of the political process and competition. This can lead to a deviation of the ideological consensus of the systemic left and right parties, and therefore to a change in the format of inter-party competition in general.
References
1. Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty–six countries. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1999. 351 p.
2. Baron D. Review of Grossman and Helpman’s special interest politics. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002. Vol. 40. P. 1221–1229.
3. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
4. Buck S. Liquid Democracy – eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2012. Vol. 43. No. 3. S. 626–635.
5. Baldini G., Bolgerini S. So similar yet so different: Alternative für Deutschland and the pirate party / D’Ottavio G., Saalfeld T. (eds.). Germany after the 2013 elections: Breaking the mould of postunification. Abingdon : Routledge, 2015. P. 181–202.
6. Bartels H. Die Vorgeschichte: die Urheberrechtsdebatte und die Schwedische Piratpartiet // Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 15–28.
7. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
8. Blum C., Zuber C. Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 162–182.
9. Bodo B. Piracy versus privacy: An analysis of values encoded in the pirate browser. International Journal of Communication. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 818–838.
10. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
11. Brunclik M. Piratske strany: Novy fenomen v politice. Nase spolecnost. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 1. S. 21–29.
12. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London : The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
13. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
14. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
15. Erlingsson G., Persson M. The Swedish Pirate party and the 2009 European parliament election: Protest or issue voting?. Politics. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 121–128.
16. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
17. Cammaerts B. Pirates on the liquid shores of liberal democracy: Movement frames of European pirate parties. Javnost – The Public. 2015. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 19–36.
18. Cosstick A. OK, computer: File sharing the music industry, and why we need the pirate party. Journal of Media and Communication. 2009. URL: https://platformjmc.com/2014/10/29/ok–computer–file–sharing–the–music–industry–and–why–we–need–the–pirate–party–2009/.
19. Koschmieder C. Klarmachen zum Ändern? Die Piratenfraktion nach zwei Jahren im Berliner Abgeordnetenhaus. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2014. Vol. 45. No. 2. S. 365–382.
20. Maskarinec P. The Czech Pirate party in the 2010 and 2013 parliamentary election and the 2014 European parliament elections: Spatial analysis of voters support. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 5–33.
21. Miegel F., Olsson T. From pirates to politicians: The story of the swedish file shares who became a political party / Carpentier N. (ed.). Democracy, journalism and technology: New developments in an enlarged Europe. Tartu : University of Tartu Press, 2008. P. 203–215.
22. Niedermayer O. Die Wähler der Piratenpartei: Wo kommen sie her, wer sind sie und was bewegt sie zur Piratenwahl // Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 63–73.
23. Niedermayer O. Erfolgsbedingungen neuer Parteien im Parteiensystem am Beispiel der Piratenpartei Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2010. Vol. 41. No. 4. S. 838–854.
24. Novotny L. Liquid democracy a Piratska strana v Nemecku. Acta Politologica. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 2. S. 154–165.
25. Novotny L. Pirati v berlinske poslanecke snemovne: Bilance jejich dosavadniho püsobem. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. S. 1–16.
26. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
27. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
28. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
29. Putini A. New political actors in the informational era. The pirate party. The ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux. September 4–7, 2013.
30. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
31. Uszkai R., Vicä C. How to assess the emergence of the European pirate parties. Towards a Research Agenda. Sfera Politicii. 2012. Vol. 20. No. 169. P. 46–55.
32. Frederiksson M. The Pirate party and the politics of communication. International Journal of Communication. Vol. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 909–924.
33. Frederiksson M. Piracy and the politics of social media. Social Sciences. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 41–53.
34. Frederiksson M. Pirate politics between protest movement and the parliament. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 97–114.
35. Frederiksson M., Arvanitakis J. Piracy, property and the crisis of democracy. eJournal of eDemocracy. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 134–150.
36. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
37. Hartleb F. Außenansicht: Im Takt der Piraten. Eine neue Partei zeigt den alten, wie wenig sie Mitglieder an Entscheidungen beteiligen. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2012. Vol. 2.
38. Hensel A., Klecha S. Die Piratenpartei. Havarie eines politischen Projekts?. Frankfurt/Main : Otto Brenner Stiftung, 2013. P. 16–37.
39. Khutkyy D. Pirate parties: The social movements of electronic democracy. Journal of Comparative Politics. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 49–68.
40. Charvat J. Pravice nebo levice? Analyza ideologie piratskych stran. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 29–39.
41. Jääsaari J., Hilden J. European pirate parties and the politics of communication. Research report on the project communication rights in the 2014 European election campaign. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2015. 50 p.
42. Jääsaari J., Hilden J. From file sharing to free culture: The evolving agenda of European pirate parties. International Journal of Communication. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 870–889.
43. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
44. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
45. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
46. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
47. Baldini G., Bolgerini S. So similar yet so different: Alternative für Deutschland and the pirate party / D’Ottavio G., Saalfeld T. (eds.). Germany after the 2013 elections: Breaking the mould of postunification. Abingdon : Routledge, 2015. P. 181–202.
48. Hensel A., Klecha S. Die Piratenpartei. Havarie eines politischen Projekts?. Frankfurt/Main : Otto Brenner Stiftung, 2013. P. 16–37.
49. Koschmieder C. Klarmachen zum Ändern? Die Piratenfraktion nach zwei Jahren im Berliner Abgeordnetenhaus. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2014. Vol. 45. No. 2. S. 365–382.
50. Niedermayer O. Erfolgsbedingungen neuer Parteien im Parteiensystem am Beispiel der Piratenpartei Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2010. Vol. 41. No. 4. S. 838–854.
51. Novotny L. Pirati v berlinske poslanecke snemovne: Bilance jejich dosavadniho püsobem. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. S. 1–16.
52. Maskarinec P. The Czech Pirate party in the 2010 and 2013 parliamentary election and the 2014 European parliament elections: Spatial analysis of voters support. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 5–33.
53. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
54. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
55. Edick C. The golden age of piracy: Can open–source democracy redefine citizenship for the internet age?. Harvard International Review. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 7–9.
56. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
57. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
58. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
59. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
60. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
61. Bartels H. Die Vorgeschichte: die Urheberrechtsdebatte und die Schwedische Piratpartiet / Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 15–28.
62. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
63. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
64. Erlingsson G., Persson M. The Swedish Pirate party and the 2009 European parliament election: Protest or issue voting? Politics. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 121–128.
65. Miegel F., Olsson T. From pirates to politicians: The story of the swedish file shares who became a political party // Carpentier N. (ed.). Democracy, journalism and technology: New developments in an enlarged Europe. Tartu : University of Tartu Press, 2008. P. 203–215.
66. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
67. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
68. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
69. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
70. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
71. Кольцов В. Феномен антиістеблішментських партій як прагматичної напівлояльної опозиції у країнах Вишеградської групи. Політикус. 2018. № 1. С. 48–55.
72. Литвин В. Феномен антиістеблішментських партій: на прикладі країн Центрально–Східної Європи // Політичні партії і вибори: українські та світові практики / відп. за випуск Анатолій Романюк, Віталій Литвин, Ігор Осадчук. Львів : ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, 2019. Вип. 3. С. 261–268.
73. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
74. Nedelcu H. Disturbing the peace: A typology of European antiestablishment political parties in the 21st century. Presented at the ECSA–C 10th Biennial Conference «Europe and Peace». May 8–10, 2014.
75. Edick C. The golden age of piracy: Can open–source democracy redefine citizenship for the internet age?. Harvard International Review. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 7–9.
76. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
77. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London : The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
78. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
79. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
80. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
81. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
82. Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1997. 453 p.
83. Inglehart R., Abramson P. Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review. 1999. Vol. 93. No. 3. P. 665–677.
84. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
85. Seemann M. Plattformneutralität – Das politische Denken der Piraten / Bieber C., Leggewie C. (eds.). Unter piraten. Erkundungen in einer neuen politischen arena. Bielefeld, 2012. S. 91–99.
86. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
87. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
88. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
89. Kulish N. Pirates’ strong showing in Berlin elections surprises even them. The New York Times. September 19, 2011. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/world/europe/in–berlin–pirates–win–8–9–percent–of–vote–in–regional–races.html.
90. Dokos T., Poli E., Rosselli C., Lecha E., Tocci N. Eurocriticism: The Eurozone crisis and anti–establishment groups in Southern Europe. IAI Working Papers. 2013. No. 1333. 18 p.
91. Hartleb F. Außenansicht: Im Takt der Piraten. Eine neue Partei zeigt den alten, wie wenig sie Mitglieder an Entscheidungen beteiligen. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2012. Vol. 2.
92. Blum C., Zuber C. Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 162–182.
93. Buck S. Liquid Democracy – eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2012. Vol. 43. No. 3. S. 626–635.
94. Cammaerts B. Pirates on the liquid shores of liberal democracy: Movement frames of European pirate parties. Javnost – The Public. 2015. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 19–36.
95. Frederiksson M., Arvanitakis J. Piracy, property and the crisis of democracy. eJournal of eDemocracy. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 134–150.
96. Novotny L. Liquid democracy a Piratska strana v Nemecku. Acta Politologica. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 2. S. 154–165.
97. Khutkyy D. Pirate parties: The social movements of electronic democracy. Journal of Comparative Politics. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 49–68.
98. Hartleb F. All tomorrow’s parties: The changing face of European party politics. European View. 2012. Vol. 11. No. 2.
99. Margetts H. Cyber parties / Katz R., Crotty W. (eds.). Handbook of party politics. Sage, 2006. P. 528–535.
100. Nedelcu H. Tribunes and patricians: Radical fringe parties in the 21st century. Review of European and Russian Affairs. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 1–23.
101. Putini A. New political actors in the informational era. The pirate party. The ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux. September 4–7, 2013.
102. Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1997. 453 p.
103. Grossman G., Helpman E. Special interest politics. MIT Press, 2001. 364 p.
104. Martineau N.-G. The influence of special interests and party activists of electoral competition. Center for Economic Studies, 2012. 43 p.
2. Baron D. Review of Grossman and Helpman’s special interest politics. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002. Vol. 40. P. 1221–1229.
3. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
4. Buck S. Liquid Democracy – eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2012. Vol. 43. No. 3. S. 626–635.
5. Baldini G., Bolgerini S. So similar yet so different: Alternative für Deutschland and the pirate party / D’Ottavio G., Saalfeld T. (eds.). Germany after the 2013 elections: Breaking the mould of postunification. Abingdon : Routledge, 2015. P. 181–202.
6. Bartels H. Die Vorgeschichte: die Urheberrechtsdebatte und die Schwedische Piratpartiet // Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 15–28.
7. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
8. Blum C., Zuber C. Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 162–182.
9. Bodo B. Piracy versus privacy: An analysis of values encoded in the pirate browser. International Journal of Communication. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 818–838.
10. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
11. Brunclik M. Piratske strany: Novy fenomen v politice. Nase spolecnost. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 1. S. 21–29.
12. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London : The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
13. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
14. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
15. Erlingsson G., Persson M. The Swedish Pirate party and the 2009 European parliament election: Protest or issue voting?. Politics. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 121–128.
16. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
17. Cammaerts B. Pirates on the liquid shores of liberal democracy: Movement frames of European pirate parties. Javnost – The Public. 2015. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 19–36.
18. Cosstick A. OK, computer: File sharing the music industry, and why we need the pirate party. Journal of Media and Communication. 2009. URL: https://platformjmc.com/2014/10/29/ok–computer–file–sharing–the–music–industry–and–why–we–need–the–pirate–party–2009/.
19. Koschmieder C. Klarmachen zum Ändern? Die Piratenfraktion nach zwei Jahren im Berliner Abgeordnetenhaus. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2014. Vol. 45. No. 2. S. 365–382.
20. Maskarinec P. The Czech Pirate party in the 2010 and 2013 parliamentary election and the 2014 European parliament elections: Spatial analysis of voters support. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 5–33.
21. Miegel F., Olsson T. From pirates to politicians: The story of the swedish file shares who became a political party / Carpentier N. (ed.). Democracy, journalism and technology: New developments in an enlarged Europe. Tartu : University of Tartu Press, 2008. P. 203–215.
22. Niedermayer O. Die Wähler der Piratenpartei: Wo kommen sie her, wer sind sie und was bewegt sie zur Piratenwahl // Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 63–73.
23. Niedermayer O. Erfolgsbedingungen neuer Parteien im Parteiensystem am Beispiel der Piratenpartei Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2010. Vol. 41. No. 4. S. 838–854.
24. Novotny L. Liquid democracy a Piratska strana v Nemecku. Acta Politologica. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 2. S. 154–165.
25. Novotny L. Pirati v berlinske poslanecke snemovne: Bilance jejich dosavadniho püsobem. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. S. 1–16.
26. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
27. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
28. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
29. Putini A. New political actors in the informational era. The pirate party. The ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux. September 4–7, 2013.
30. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
31. Uszkai R., Vicä C. How to assess the emergence of the European pirate parties. Towards a Research Agenda. Sfera Politicii. 2012. Vol. 20. No. 169. P. 46–55.
32. Frederiksson M. The Pirate party and the politics of communication. International Journal of Communication. Vol. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 909–924.
33. Frederiksson M. Piracy and the politics of social media. Social Sciences. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 41–53.
34. Frederiksson M. Pirate politics between protest movement and the parliament. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 97–114.
35. Frederiksson M., Arvanitakis J. Piracy, property and the crisis of democracy. eJournal of eDemocracy. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 134–150.
36. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
37. Hartleb F. Außenansicht: Im Takt der Piraten. Eine neue Partei zeigt den alten, wie wenig sie Mitglieder an Entscheidungen beteiligen. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2012. Vol. 2.
38. Hensel A., Klecha S. Die Piratenpartei. Havarie eines politischen Projekts?. Frankfurt/Main : Otto Brenner Stiftung, 2013. P. 16–37.
39. Khutkyy D. Pirate parties: The social movements of electronic democracy. Journal of Comparative Politics. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 49–68.
40. Charvat J. Pravice nebo levice? Analyza ideologie piratskych stran. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 29–39.
41. Jääsaari J., Hilden J. European pirate parties and the politics of communication. Research report on the project communication rights in the 2014 European election campaign. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2015. 50 p.
42. Jääsaari J., Hilden J. From file sharing to free culture: The evolving agenda of European pirate parties. International Journal of Communication. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 870–889.
43. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
44. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
45. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
46. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
47. Baldini G., Bolgerini S. So similar yet so different: Alternative für Deutschland and the pirate party / D’Ottavio G., Saalfeld T. (eds.). Germany after the 2013 elections: Breaking the mould of postunification. Abingdon : Routledge, 2015. P. 181–202.
48. Hensel A., Klecha S. Die Piratenpartei. Havarie eines politischen Projekts?. Frankfurt/Main : Otto Brenner Stiftung, 2013. P. 16–37.
49. Koschmieder C. Klarmachen zum Ändern? Die Piratenfraktion nach zwei Jahren im Berliner Abgeordnetenhaus. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2014. Vol. 45. No. 2. S. 365–382.
50. Niedermayer O. Erfolgsbedingungen neuer Parteien im Parteiensystem am Beispiel der Piratenpartei Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2010. Vol. 41. No. 4. S. 838–854.
51. Novotny L. Pirati v berlinske poslanecke snemovne: Bilance jejich dosavadniho püsobem. Central European Journal of Politics. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. S. 1–16.
52. Maskarinec P. The Czech Pirate party in the 2010 and 2013 parliamentary election and the 2014 European parliament elections: Spatial analysis of voters support. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 5–33.
53. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
54. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
55. Edick C. The golden age of piracy: Can open–source democracy redefine citizenship for the internet age?. Harvard International Review. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 7–9.
56. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
57. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
58. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
59. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
60. Vodova P., Voda P. The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 181–189.
61. Bartels H. Die Vorgeschichte: die Urheberrechtsdebatte und die Schwedische Piratpartiet / Niedermayer O. (ed.). Die Piratenpartei. Aktuelle und umfassende Bestandsaufnahme aller Aspekte der Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden : Springer, 2012. S. 15–28.
62. Bolleyer N., Little C., von Nostitz F.–C. Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German pirate parties. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2015. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 158–178.
63. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
64. Erlingsson G., Persson M. The Swedish Pirate party and the 2009 European parliament election: Protest or issue voting? Politics. 2011. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 121–128.
65. Miegel F., Olsson T. From pirates to politicians: The story of the swedish file shares who became a political party // Carpentier N. (ed.). Democracy, journalism and technology: New developments in an enlarged Europe. Tartu : University of Tartu Press, 2008. P. 203–215.
66. Svasand L. The Swedish Pirate party: Towards institutionalisation? / Harmel H., Svasand L. (eds.). Institutionalisation of political parties. Comparative cases. London, Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield International, 2019. P. 155–169.
67. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
68. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
69. Beyer J. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, Wikileaks, the Pirate party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 141–154.
70. Sarovec D. Assured newcomers on a squally sea? The Czech Pirate party before and after the 2017 elections. Acta Fakulty filozoficke Zapadoceske univerzity v Plzni. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 1–21.
71. Кольцов В. Феномен антиістеблішментських партій як прагматичної напівлояльної опозиції у країнах Вишеградської групи. Політикус. 2018. № 1. С. 48–55.
72. Литвин В. Феномен антиістеблішментських партій: на прикладі країн Центрально–Східної Європи // Політичні партії і вибори: українські та світові практики / відп. за випуск Анатолій Романюк, Віталій Литвин, Ігор Осадчук. Львів : ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, 2019. Вип. 3. С. 261–268.
73. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
74. Nedelcu H. Disturbing the peace: A typology of European antiestablishment political parties in the 21st century. Presented at the ECSA–C 10th Biennial Conference «Europe and Peace». May 8–10, 2014.
75. Edick C. The golden age of piracy: Can open–source democracy redefine citizenship for the internet age?. Harvard International Review. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 7–9.
76. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
77. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London : The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
78. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
79. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
80. Demker M. Sailing along new cleavages: Understanding the electoral success of the Swedish pirate party in the European parliament election 2009. Government and Opposition. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 189–192.
81. Novotny L., Sarovec D. Contemporary pirate parties in the post–material era: Comparing success cases. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 29–51.
82. Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1997. 453 p.
83. Inglehart R., Abramson P. Measuring postmaterialism. American Political Science Review. 1999. Vol. 93. No. 3. P. 665–677.
84. Otjes S. All on the same boat? Voting for pirate parties in comparative perspective. Politics. 2020. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 38–53.
85. Seemann M. Plattformneutralität – Das politische Denken der Piraten / Bieber C., Leggewie C. (eds.). Unter piraten. Erkundungen in einer neuen politischen arena. Bielefeld, 2012. S. 91–99.
86. Burkart P. Pirate politics: The new information policy contests. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 2014. 218 p.
87. Zulianello M. Mobilizing young voters? A cross–national analysis of contextual factors in pirate voting. European Politics and Society. 2018. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 282–298.
88. Hartleb F. Anti–elitist cyber parties?. Journal of Public Affairs. 2013. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 364–365.
89. Kulish N. Pirates’ strong showing in Berlin elections surprises even them. The New York Times. September 19, 2011. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/world/europe/in–berlin–pirates–win–8–9–percent–of–vote–in–regional–races.html.
90. Dokos T., Poli E., Rosselli C., Lecha E., Tocci N. Eurocriticism: The Eurozone crisis and anti–establishment groups in Southern Europe. IAI Working Papers. 2013. No. 1333. 18 p.
91. Hartleb F. Außenansicht: Im Takt der Piraten. Eine neue Partei zeigt den alten, wie wenig sie Mitglieder an Entscheidungen beteiligen. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2012. Vol. 2.
92. Blum C., Zuber C. Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 162–182.
93. Buck S. Liquid Democracy – eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen. 2012. Vol. 43. No. 3. S. 626–635.
94. Cammaerts B. Pirates on the liquid shores of liberal democracy: Movement frames of European pirate parties. Javnost – The Public. 2015. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 19–36.
95. Frederiksson M., Arvanitakis J. Piracy, property and the crisis of democracy. eJournal of eDemocracy. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 134–150.
96. Novotny L. Liquid democracy a Piratska strana v Nemecku. Acta Politologica. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 2. S. 154–165.
97. Khutkyy D. Pirate parties: The social movements of electronic democracy. Journal of Comparative Politics. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 49–68.
98. Hartleb F. All tomorrow’s parties: The changing face of European party politics. European View. 2012. Vol. 11. No. 2.
99. Margetts H. Cyber parties / Katz R., Crotty W. (eds.). Handbook of party politics. Sage, 2006. P. 528–535.
100. Nedelcu H. Tribunes and patricians: Radical fringe parties in the 21st century. Review of European and Russian Affairs. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 1–23.
101. Putini A. New political actors in the informational era. The pirate party. The ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux. September 4–7, 2013.
102. Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1997. 453 p.
103. Grossman G., Helpman E. Special interest politics. MIT Press, 2001. 364 p.
104. Martineau N.-G. The influence of special interests and party activists of electoral competition. Center for Economic Studies, 2012. 43 p.
Published
2023-06-08
How to Cite
Mudryi, R. (2023). PROGRAMMATIC PRINCIPLES AND MANIFESTATION OF DIGITAL PIRATE PARTIES IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. Litopys Volyni, (28), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.32782/2305-9389/2023.28.39
Section
Political science
